Legal Opinion

Rothschild v. Grix

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1875PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Superior Court of Detroit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

This is a writ of error to the superior court of Detroit. The defendant in error recovered under the money counts on a promissory note dated October 16th, 1871, given for two thousand dollars, by the late Arnold Kaichen, and payable one year after date, at the Germania Bank in Detroit, to the order of the defendant in error, with interest at ten per cent., and signed on the hack hy the plaintiff in error.

No steps were taken to hold Mr. Rothschild as indorser or guarantor, and the real question in the case concerns the legal nature of liis undertaking. The parties were both…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Trustees of Brimfield v. Commissioners of PortageOhio Supreme Court · 1840
  2. Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  3. Moore v. . CrossNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Dean v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  5. Lewis & Bros. v. Harvey & StewartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burton & Co. v. HansfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McArthur v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Davis v. Lenawee County Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Bendey v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API