Legal Opinion

Custer v. Administrative Director of the Courts

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 2005No. 26026PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

ACOBA, J.

We hold, in this appeal by Petitioner-Appellant Curtis C. Custer (Custer), from the July 16, 2003 judgment of the district court of the first circuit 1 (the court) affirming the May 5, 2003 decision of Respondent-Appellee Administrative Director of the Courts, State of Hawaii 2 (Director), that the Director may not, in an administrative hearing filed pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291E-38 (Supp.2003), consider an offense occurring after the HRS § 291E-31 (Supp. 2003) notice of administrative revocation had been issued, as a basis for increasing an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. State v. ArceoHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Gray v. Administrative Director of CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. OkumuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blaisdell v. Department of Public SafetyHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Brune v. Administrative Director of the CourtsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Urie v. ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF COURTSHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API