Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2002No. 00-CO-572PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to vacate multiple armed rape and sodomy convictions on double jeopardy grounds. We hold that because the motion, which was filed pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 (1996), properly is viewed instead as one to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Super. Ct.Crim. R. 35(a), the dou ble jeopardy claim is not barred by the movant’s failure to show cause for, or prejudice from, his failure to raise it previously on direct appeal from his conviction or in other proceedings. Reaching the merits of the double jeopardy claim, we…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alfaro v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Frye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. McCoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Cullen v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API