Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
A writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal, issued on the application of plaintiff, *977brings this Workmen’s Compensation case before us for review. When issuing the writ we entertained some doubt that such court, in reaching its decision, La.App., 39 So.2d 139, had correctly applied the law to the facts which it found. Aiding in providing that doubt was the insistence of plaintiff’s counsel, through allegations in the application, that the holding contravened several cited decisions in our jurisprudence.
The findings of fact of the Court of Appeal (as well as of the district…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Carlino v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Hughes v. EnloeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Daniels v. Shreveport Producing & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Lee v. International Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Wright v. National Surety Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Brannon v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Fruge v. Pacific Employers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Reed v. Calcasieu Paper CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- LeBlanc v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.