Legal Opinion
County of Seneca v. Cheney
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 9, 1993No. 1098, Docket 92-6296PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Circuit Judge:
The governmental defendants (hereafter “government”) appeal from Judge Larimer’s issuance of a preliminary injunction pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (“BRAC”), Pub.L. No. 101-510, 104 Stat. 1808, 10 U.S.C. § 2687 note (Supp. Ill 1991), enjoining a proposed reduction in force (“RIF”) at the Seneca Army Depot (“SEAD”) in Romulus, New York. Judge Larimer held that the appellees (“Seneca”) had demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their claim that the government had circumvented the base closure process by undertaking a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- IIT v. Vencap, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Disabled American Veterans v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Specter v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Starter Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Converse, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Malkentzos v. DebuonoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- COALITION ON WEST VALLEY NUCLEAR WASTES v. BodmanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Preservation Coalition of Erie County v. Federal Transit AdministrationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- County of Seneca v. CheneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.