Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Corrigan v. McAllister

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1985No. 84-1357PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well-settled that “[i]n order to grant a writ of mandamus, the court must find that relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6 [15 O.O.3d 3], paragraph one of the syllabus; State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29, certiorari denied (1983),_U.S._, 78 L. Ed. 2d 723; State, ex rel. Bd. of Commrs., v. Weir (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 381, 383-384.

On the issue of an…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Fyffe v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. WoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API