State ex rel. Corrigan v. McAllister
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
It is well-settled that “[i]n order to grant a writ of mandamus, the court must find that relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6 [15 O.O.3d 3], paragraph one of the syllabus; State, ex rel. Berger, v. McMonagle (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 28, 29, certiorari denied (1983),_U.S._, 78 L. Ed. 2d 723; State, ex rel. Bd. of Commrs., v. Weir (1983), 6 Ohio St. 3d 381, 383-384.
On the issue of an…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Fyffe v. EvansOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. GwinOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. WoodmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.