People v. Hupp
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment pronounced upon defendant after he had been found guilty of assault with a deadly weapon, with one prior conviction of a felony which he admitted.
The sole question for consideration is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict and judgment. Defendant argues that he was only guilty of the misdemeanor defined in section 417 of the Penal Code but not of the felony denounced by section 245 of that code.
The defendant argues that the complaining witnesses attempted to enter his home to arrest him without a warrant; that they were trespassers…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. KilvingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Michel v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- People v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Murphy v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Bate v. JolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. GardnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. TylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.