Kahan v. Alaska Junk Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Sheeks, J., entered November 4, 1919, in favor of the defendants, in an action for equitable relief, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.
For many years prior to 1918, the appellant and the respondent Falk, as copartners, had been engaged in the junk business in the city of Spokane, Washington, and for a somewhat similar period, the respondent Schwartz had been engaged in a like business in the city of Seattle. In June, 1918, the agreed value of the assets of the firm of Kahan and Falk was $116,000, and the agreed value of the assets of the business belonging to Schwartz was $498,000. For some time prior to 1918, these parties had discussed a consolidation of their assets and energies. On May 6, 1918, a preliminary written…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Taylor v. Decatur Mineral & Land Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Alabama · 1901
- Cope v. District Fair Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Feess v. Mechanics' State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Sidway v. Missouri Land & Live-Stock Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1900
- Empire Hotel Co. v. MainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Draper v. Robinson Lettuce FarmsWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Blinn v. Almira Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
- Cardiff v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- De White v. DentWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. Standard Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.