Cardiff v. Johnson
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— The amended complaint of respondent seeks to have a certain contract for a conveyance, executed by the Washington Dehydrated Food Company, a corporation, to the Perham Fruit Company, a corporation, deposited with the defendant Yakima National Bank, a corporation, for delivery to the Perham Fruit Company upon the payment of the balance of $29,500 of the purchase price after the cash payment of $500 by the Perham Fruit Company in accordance with the contract, to be decreed void and of no effect as in fraud of the rights of respondent, and the same re*455strained and enjoined. Upon the filing of…
Also in this document: Dissent; Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Theis v. Spokane Falls Gas Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
- Parsons v. Tacoma Smelting & Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
- Price v. HolcombSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Bergman Clay Manufacturing Co. v. M. L. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Pitcher v. Lone Pine-Surprise Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. Los Lugos Gold MinesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- Heylman v. Idaho Continental Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1926
- King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- King County v. Taxpayers of King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1997