Blinn v. Almira Trading Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
On petition of appellants, a temporary receiver was appointed by the trial court and an order made returnable on a certain day to show cause why such appointment should not be made permanent pendente lite. On the return day, a hearing was had, both on oral and documentary evidence, amounting virtually to a trial on the merits. The only question, then, to be decided was whether or not the receivership should be continued pendente lite. The appointment of a temporary receiver was denied.
In 1914, Blinn & Howard and J. C. Keller, general merchants, and the Central Washington Warehouse Company, a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bergman Clay Manufacturing Co. v. M. L. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Secord v. Wheeler Gold Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Frost v. Puget Sound Realty AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Draper v. Robinson Lettuce FarmsWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Kahan v. Alaska Junk Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott v. Trans-System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Scott v. Trans-System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Henry George & Sons, Inc. v. Cooper-George, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
- Bergman v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1965