Legal Opinion
State v. Natal
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 15, 1887No. 9935PublishedCited by 5 opinions
APPEAL from the First Recorder’s Court. Dewey, J.
1Opinion of the Court
The.opinion of the Court was delivered by
Bermudez, C. J.
The defendants appeal from judgments rendered against them for the payment of a fine and in default of payment sentencing them to imprisonment for the violation of ordinance No. 4798 A. S., which forbids the keeping of private markets within six squares of a public marker within the limits of the City of New Orleans.
The facts are admitted.
Several defences are set up, the main of which is that the law in furtherance of which the ordinance was adopted, as well as the ordinance itself, have, been abrogated, annulled and repealed and are'no…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People ex rel. Frank v. Bd. of Supervisors of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Milner v. PensacolaUnited States Circuit Court for the Northern District of Florida · 1875
- Blunt v. ConnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
3Cited by5 opinions
- Natal v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Town of St. Martinville v. DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State ex rel. Tranchina v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- State ex rel. Texada v. CapdevielleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
- City of New Orleans v. FaberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901