Legal Opinion
Natal v. Louisiana
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 13, 1891No. 271PublishedCited by 56 opinions
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE LOUISIANA. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray
The plaintiffs in error were severally complained of, tried, convicted and sentenced in a recorder’s court in the city of New Orleans for keeping a private market within six squares of a public market, in violation of § J of an ordinance of the city, copied in the margin, 1 and passed under the authority conferred by the statute of Louisiana of 1878, c. 100, as follows :
“ Sec. 2. That the city council of the city of New Orleans be and they are hereby authorized and empowered to make such arrangements and pass such ordinances for the government and regulation of the private markets in the'…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Callan v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- First Municipality v. CuttingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1849
- Morano v. MayorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1831
- Village of Buffalo v. WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1833
- State v. GutierrezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Baldwin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cheff v. SchnackenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Baker v. City of FairbanksAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.