Legal Opinion

City of New Orleans v. Faber

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1901No. 13,806PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Eourth Eecorder’s Court, City of New Orleans— Murray, J.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Monroe, J.

Defendant, having been charged with the violation of City Ordinance No. 312, New Council Series, undertook to defend himself by setting up the unconstitutionality of the ordinance, and of the. law under the authority of which it was adopted; and, having been convicted and sentenced, has appealed directly to this court. The ordinance in question malms it unlawful for any person “to conduct a private market, or to sell at retail any fresh meat, fresh fish, game, ooultry or vegetables, except potatoes and onions, in any building, place, store,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Natal v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. City of Davenport v. KelleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  3. Landry v. L'EgliseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  4. Le Claire v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  5. State v. NatalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grumbach v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Town of St. Martinville v. DugasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Angelo v. City of Winston-SalemSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Tranchina v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  5. Murat v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API