Legal Opinion

State v. Cantieny

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 1885PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hen-nepin county, Koon, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

The defendant was tried in Hennepin county upon an indictment charging him with the murder of Robert Laughlin in the eity of Minneapolis. By verdict of the jury he was found guilty *3of manslaughter in the second degree. Upon a case, and upon affidavits presented as proof of newly-discovered evidence, a new trial was sought, but was refused, and the defendant appealed to this court.

It is claimed that it was not proved that the offence was committed in the county of Hennepin, where the indictment was found; and it is true that no witness testified directly that such was the fact. Yet there is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  3. Roddy v. FinneganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1876
  4. Noles v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Gray v. First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific R. R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1868

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Johnson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Smith v. HubbardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  5. State ex rel. Erickson v. WestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API