Legal Opinion

United States v. Chad Pyles

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 7, 2017No. 14-3069PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dissenting opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

WILKINS, Circuit Judge:

Pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3551 et seq., the District Court must, at the time of sentencing, “state in open court the reasons for its imposition of [a] particular sentence.” 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). This provision mandates that the District Court offer a “reasoned basis” for its decision and “consider[ ]” all non-frivolous mitigatiqn arguments. Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 356, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).

*84Chad Pyles challenges his 132-month sentence on the basis that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Puckett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. James LittleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. Lafonzo IracksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Guadalupe GalavizCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Michael PalmerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2022
  5. United States v. Ahmed AbukhatallahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2026

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API