Legal Opinion · Dissent

Quicken Loans v. Marsha Gale Walters, Administratrix

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2017No. 16-0298Separate

1Dissent

LOUGHRY, C.J.,

dissenting, joined by KETCHUM, J.:

The majority’s illogical and legally unsound opinion takes a perfectly straightforward statute and, despite declaring it to be unambiguous, badly misconstrues it, making a perfectly lawful banking transaction illegal. West Virginia Code § 31-17-8(m)(8) prohibits only the predatory practice of making loans which on their face appear to be adequately collateralized, but actually exceed the securing property’s fair market value when aggregated with other loans. In no way does the statute prohibit making loans which exceed 100 percent…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State v. General Daniel Morgan Post No. 548West Virginia Supreme Court · 1959

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API