Legal Opinion

Charles v. Elkhorn Mining Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 12, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by William:

Rogers Clay Commissioner —

Affirming.

In this suit by Henry Charles against the Elkhorn Mining Company to recover damages for personal injuries, the trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The evidence shows the following facts: In moving a coal cutting machine through the main entry of one of defendant’s mines the machine men lost control of it. The machine ran down grade and knocked down all the props and other timbers under the roof of the entry for a distance of 75 or 100 feet. The mine foreman directed the timber…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Finalyson v. Utica Mining & Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
  2. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Williamson's Administrator v. Blue Grass Fluorspar Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. High Splint Coal Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Green's Administrator v. C. & O. Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. First-Owensboro Bank & Trust Co. v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API