Legal Opinion
Fidelity and Casualty Co. of New York v. Homan
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 18, 1959No. 1292PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
116 So.2d 444 (1959)
FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK, Appellant,
v.
Forest F. HOMAN and Norman B. Fisher, Individually and As Partners t/a Central Paving Company, Appellees.
No. 1292.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Second District.
December 18, 1959.
Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando, for appellant.
Shepard & Dykes, Cocoa, for appellees.
SPOTO, I.C., Associate Judge.
The appellant, a New York surety company, authorized to do business in Florida, filed its complaint against Forest F. Homan, the appellee, and Norman B. Fisher, individually and as partners trading as Central Paving…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hagen v. VineySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- I. Epstein & Brother v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Nathan v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
- Snyder v. DavisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Thomas v. NathanSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. GaneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Kennedy v. RichmondDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- In re GrantDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986
- Amsler v. American Home Assur. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.