Legal Opinion
Nathan v. Thomas
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Duval County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHocker, J.
— The declaration in this action was as follows :
“The plaintiff, Louis J. Nathan, surviving partner of the late co-partnership composed of Louis J. Nathan and Sam J. Nathan, doing business as the Jacksonville Ice Company, by his attorneys, Cockrell & Cockrell, sues the defendants, Chas. E. Thomas, E. A. Perry and E. I. Leighton, late co-partners doing business under the firm name and style of the.Florida Ice Cream & Dairy Com*236pany, for that the defendants on the 29th day of July, 1910, by their promissory note, now overdue, promised to pay the plaintiff $319.77, thirty days after date with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Feinberg v. StearnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
- Bishop v. TaylorSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
- Philadelphia Underwriters, Insurance Co. of North America v. BigelowSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Winn v. CogginsSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
- Hayman v. WeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Phillips v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Cotton States Belting & Supply Co. v. Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Thomas v. NathanSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.