Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Jeffrey Mining Machinery Division v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1990No. 89-2161PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the medical reports in issue attributed claimant’s disability to non-allowed conditions. Appellant submits that the only condition allowed is “[hjerniated nucleus pulposes L5-S1 on *93right.” Since the medical reports consistently referred to “lumbar strain” and “low back pain” with respect to claimant’s condition, appellant argues that claimant’s condition is not compensable.

In our view, the commission did not abuse its discretion in refusing to hear appellant’s appeal and, thus, we uphold the granting of temporary total compensation to claimant, because there was “some…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Burley v. Coil Packing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Milburn v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tradesmen International v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Rose v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-529 (4-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. State ex rel. Turner v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State ex rel. Turner v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Shetler v. Indus. Comm., Oh, Unpublished Decision (6-4-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API