Rose v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-529 (4-17-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
IN MANDAMUS ON OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE'S DECISION.
{¶ 1} Delmer Rose filed this action in mandamus, seeking a writ which compels the Industrial Commission of Ohio ("commission") to vacate its order denying him permanent total disability ("PTD") compensation and which compels the commission to enter a new order granting him PTD compensation.
{¶ 2} In accord with the local rules, the case was referred to a magistrate to conduct appropriate proceedings. The parties stipulated to pertinent evidence and filed briefs. The magistrate then issued a magistrate's decision which contains…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State ex rel. Noll v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State ex rel. Teece v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Gay v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Elliott v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Rose v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Rose v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007