Legal Opinion
Caley v. Hudson
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 8, 1991No. 2:90-cv-72379PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DUGGAN, District Judge.
Petitioner, Kenneth David Caley, at the time an inmate at the Lakeland Correctional Facility of the Michigan Department of Corrections, filed a petition for writ of ha-beas corpus on August 13, 1990, challenging his confinement for parole violation on the ground that the Michigan Parole Board denied him a revocation hearing by relying on an unconstitutional provision of state law, namely Mich.Comp.Laws § 791.240a(l). This section provides, in part, that parolees subsequently convicted of a crime are not entitled to a revocation hearing.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Witzke v. WithrowDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
- Triplett v. Deputy Warden, Jackson PrisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Juarez v. RenicoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Bridges 437651 v. RewertsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022
- Bridges 437651 v. RewertsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
- Partee 146882 v. MacauleyDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
- Robinson v. BushDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019