Legal Opinion
Juarez v. Renico
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 12, 2001No. 00-10258-BCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
LAWSON, District Judge.
Petitioner, Reuben Juarez, presently confined at the Mid Michigan Correctional Facility in St. Louis, Michigan, seeks the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. In his application, filed pro se, petitioner attacks the Michigan Parole Board’s denial of his release on parole, resulting in his continued confinement. Petitioner’s application does not entitle him to habeas relief and the petition shall be denied with prejudice.
I
Petitioner is a prisoner of the State of Michigan.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- McIntosh v. BookerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Crowley v. RenicoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Barnes v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Hogan v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024