Legal Opinion

Hoblitzell v. CITY OF IONE

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 2003No. C039919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KOLKEY, J.

Timothy Hoblitzell (plaintiff) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of the City of Ione (City) on plaintiff’s claim that the City was vicariously liable for the allegedly tortious conduct of two of its employees.

This appeal requires us to decide whether public employees who commit tortious acts while acting outside their employer’s jurisdiction, outside of their official duties, and for personal reasons may nonetheless be deemed to be acting within the scope of their employment. We conclude that they are not and shall affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lisa M. v. Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Artiglio v. Corning Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Perez v. Van Groningen & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Kephart v. Genuity, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Martin v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2009
  4. Juarez v. San Bernardino City Unified Sch. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Martinez v. City of West SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API