Legal Opinion
Sea Hunt, Inc. v. Unidentified, Shipwrecked Vessel or Vessels
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 25, 1998No. Civil Action 2:98CV281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
The parties come before the Court on the United States’ Renewed Motion to Intervene on behalf of the Kingdom of Spain (“Spain”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24, Supplemental Admiralty Rule (C)(6), and Local Admiralty Rules (e)(3) and (e)(13). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion.
I
By Order of March 12, 1998, this Court issued a warrant for the arrest of the defendant vessel(s), granted Plaintiff the exclusive right to salvage the vessels, allowed sixty (60) days within which potential claimants could file claims to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schooner Exchange v. McFaddonSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
- Compania Espanola De Navegacion Maritima, SA v. the NavemarSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ex Parte MuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. Libellants & of the Schooner AmistadSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Republic of Argentina v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Sea Hunt, Inc. v. the Unidentified, Shipwrecked Vessel or VesselsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
- Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte FreshCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Kingdom Of Spain v. Unidentified Shipwrecked Vessel Or VesselsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000