Roeder v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed this case seeking a belat,ed remedy for the horrible suffering to which they were subjected by the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran more than 20 years ago. There is no dispute that members of the plaintiff class were held hostage, and at times tortured, for 444 days after being seized from the United States Embassy in Tehran by Iranian governmental officials. There is also no dispute that the spouses and children of those hostages, who comprise the remainder of the plaintiff class, were also held hostage during this time,…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Price v. Socialist People's Libyan Arab JamahiriyaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Roeder v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Cicippio-Puleo v. Islamic Republic of IranCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- In Re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.