Legal Opinion

City of Portland v. Peterson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1982No. DA 190309-8004, CA A21210PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for violation of a Portland city ordinance which prohibits loitering to solicit prostitution. She contends, first, that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence, because the police had no reasonable suspicion on which to base stopping the car in which she was riding.

In the middle of the afternoon on April 3, 1980, Officer Wong, in plain clothes and driving a sports car along a busy northeast Portland street, observed defendant and a female companion, Julie Burr, standing at the corner of Northeast Union Avenue and Clackamas Street. He…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. DysonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. WolfeOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. City of Portland v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. State v. PilonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. City of Portland v. PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. City of Portland v. SpanglerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API