Legal Opinion

State v. Pilon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 31, 2022No. A171010PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

460 Argued and submitted February 17, 2021, reversed and remanded August 31, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MARK TANGUAY RAYMOND PILON, Defendant-Appellant. Clackamas County Circuit Court 18CR28900; A171010

516 P3d 1181

On the morning this criminal trial was set to begin, the state provided defen- dant with two previously undisclosed police reports, in violation of the discovery statutes. Defendant requested a continuance in order to review the reports and investigate the new information. The trial court denied the request for a continu- ance. Defendant challenges the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  2. State v. Velazquez-MunozCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. State v. WieseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. Steltz v. CainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API