Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Carey
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Delaware Circuit Court; J. G. Leffler, Judge. Action by Sarah E. Carey against the Cleveland, Cinnati, Chicago & St Louis Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
Appellee recovered damages for injuries received through the alleged negligence of appellant. Errors assigned: Overruling the demurrer to the amended complaint, the motion for judgment on answers to interrogatories, and the motion for a new trial.
The amended complaint avers that appellant’s main and side tracks, about six feet apart, run almost due east and *277west across Elm street, about fifty feet wide; that, because of certain obstructions (described) on the west side of the street, the view of both tracks Was cut off, and persons on foot or in vehicles were unable to see more than ten feet…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BurtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BrunkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TerrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Bader v. Mills & Baker Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Grant v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.