Legal Opinion

Grant v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1909No. 7975PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered September 18, 1908, in favor of the defendant, by direction of the court, upon withdrawing the case from the jury, after a trial on the merits, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian at a railroad crossing.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries caused by being run over by a car of defendant, at a public crossing adjacent to and immediately west of its passenger depot, at Harrison, Idaho, on June 17, 1907. The negligence charged against the defendant in the complaint is, in substance, that several cars were being pushed by an engine of defendant rapidly over its track near and upon the crossing; that no bell was rung on the engine, no whistle blown, and no notice or signal of any kind given of the approach of the train before coming to the crossing; that no…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wheeler v. Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Roth v. Union Depot Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brewer v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Walters v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Case v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  5. Mathewson v. OlmsteadWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API