Legal Opinion
Ross v. Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & Explosives
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 7, 2012No. Civil No. PJM 10-3090PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Daniel Ross filed this suit against the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATF”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and individual officers of both agencies (collectively “Defendants”), alleging various constitutional, employment discrimination, and state tort causes of action, as well as claims under federal law related to his inability to purchase a firearm. In its Memorandum Opinion issued on August 4, 2011, 807 F.Supp.2d 362 (D.Md.2011), the Court dismissed all of Ross’s claims,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens Football Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- George F. Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zundel v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Zundel v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Brush v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- Cunningham v. KahlerDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2024
- Stella Reeves v. Maryland Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2026