Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1955No. 455PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

In this jurisdiction, when the owner of an insured automobile brings an action for damages to such automobile against one whose negligence allegedly caused the damage, the court may, in its discretion, on motion of the alleged tort-feasor, make the insurance company which has indemnified the owner for only a part of the damages to the automobile, an additional party plaintiff or defendant. Burgess v. Trevathan, 236 N.C. 157, 72 S.E. 2d 231, and cited cases. See also Gaither Corp. v. Skinner, 238 N.C. 254, 77 S.E. 2d 659; Colbert v. Collins, 227 N.C. 395, 42 S.E. 2d 349; Guthrie v. Durham, 168…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Clark v. Bonsal & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Guthrie v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Gaither Corporation v. SkinnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Scott v. . BryanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Smith v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Fincher v. RhyneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Ledbetter Bros. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API