Legal Opinion

People v. Atsilis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 1975No. Docket 20842PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P. J.

The defendant pled nolo contendere to the charge of attempted larceny in a building. MCLA 750.92; MSA 28.287. He was sentenced to a term of one to two years in prison. Defendant’s only claim, on appeal, is that he was deprived of his right to due process of law by the trial judge’s failure to appoint an interpreter in defendant’s behalf.

Defendant is a Puerto Rican and claims to have little knowledge of the English language. Consequently, he contends that he did not fully understand the nature of the proceedings against him. The question of whether an interpreter is needed for the defendant is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Perovich v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. People v. WhiteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. DrossartMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. StinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. WarrenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. WallaceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Nur v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API