Breeding v. Koste
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
To establish a prescriptive easement, 1 a claimant must show adverse, exclusive, and uninterrupted use of another’s real property for twenty years. See Banks v. Pusey, 393 Md. 688, 699, 904 A.2d 448, 454 (2006). Where an easement is claimed on land that is unimproved or otherwise in a general state of nature, there is a legal presumption that the claimant’s use is by the owner’s permission. See Clickner v. Magothy River Ass’n Inc., 424 Md. 253, 281, 35 A.3d 464, 482 (2012). This presumption, first referenced by this Court in 1865, has been termed the “woodlands exception,” and, to date, has…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- White v. Pines Community Improvement Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Porter v. SchafferCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Feldstein v. SegallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Clickner v. Magothy River Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Bottini v. Dept. of Finance, Montgomery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Bontempo v. LareCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Cty. Comm'rs, St. Mary's Cty. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023
- Montgomery County v. BhattCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.