Legal Opinion

Clickner v. Magothy River Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 20, 2012No. 13, Sept. Term, 2011PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreene, J.

Six individuals and the Magothy River Association, Inc. (collectively, “Association” or “Appellees”) brought suit against the recent purchasers of Dobbins Island, David and Diana Clickner (“Clickners” or “Appellants”), seeking to establish a public right to use a beach located alongside the island’s northern crescent area. Following a bench trial on the merits, the trial judge determined that Appellees had demonstrated the existence of a prescriptive easement on behalf of the public and ordered the removal of portions of a fence erected on the beach by Appellants. In making this determination…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Post v. PearsallCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
  3. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Condry v. LaurieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Dickerson v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. White Pine Insurance Co. v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Harleysville Preferred Ins. Co. v. Rams Head Savage Mill, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. StillwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Breeding v. KosteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Cty. Comm'rs, St. Mary's Cty. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2023

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API