Legal Opinion

United States v. McQueen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 19, 2016No. 14-2561PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SILER, Circuit Judge.

David McQueen appeals his conviction and sentence for six counts of mail fraud, four counts of spending money laundering, one count of structuring, and one count of concealment money laundering. For the reasons explained below, we AFFIRM.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 2006, McQueen used a home equity loan acquired from the purchase of a rental home to personally invest in Maximum Return Trading (MRT).1 Jim Clements, the owner of MRT, represented to McQueen that Clements was earning returns of forty to fifty percent per month from currency trading. Clements told…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McQueen v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API