Legal Opinion

Blackmon v. Zufelt

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1985No. 15103PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

This dispute arises from the untimely demise of a nomadic bull. Harry and Sharon Blackmon sued their neighbors, Kolen and LaVera Zufelt, after Mr. Zufelt found the Blackmons’ bull in his front yard and shot it. A magistrate, sitting in the small claims department, awarded damages to the Blackmons. The Zufelts appealed to the district court, where the case was reexamined de novo. Upon the Zufelts’ motion, the district judge entered summary judgment against the Blackmons’ complaint. This appeal followed. We reverse and remand.

The sole issue is whether the summary judgment was precluded by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. EthingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Argyle v. SlemakerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Arthur Magill v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Loomis v. City of HaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Small v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Fullerton v. GriswoldIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Kaupp v. City of HaileyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Sutheimer v. StoltenbergIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API