Legal Opinion

Kaupp v. City of Hailey

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1986No. 16068PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

Richard and Barbara Kaupp brought suit against the City of Hailey, seeking damages and injunctive relief on allegations of trespass and inverse condemnation, when they learned that sewer and water pipe lines ran beneath their property. In response, the City claimed it had acquired a prescriptive easement for the lines. Both the Kaupps and the City moved for summary judgment under their respective theories of the case. The district court entered summary judgment in favor of the City. On appeal, the Kaupps contend that the district court erred in finding that the presence…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Riverside Development Co. v. RitchieIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Petricevich v. Salmon River Canal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Moss v. Mid-American Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Casey v. Highlands InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  5. West v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baxter v. CraneyIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Roberts v. SwimIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Anderson v. LarsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Frost v. GilbertIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Christle v. ScottIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API