Legal Opinion
Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst v. Louisiana Hydrolec
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 23, 1988No. Nos. 86-5592, 86-6424PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Per curiam
This case consists of two appeals arising from a civil action initiated by Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst (“Nilsson” or “plaintiff”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, against defendants Samuel W. Ethridge (“Ethridge”), a citizen of, and attorney practicing in Louisiana; Aqualec, Inc., a Louisiana corporation; and Louisiana Hydrolec and John W. Marmoul-ides, Louisiana citizens (Ethridge and Aqualec, Inc., appellants herein, are collectively referred to as “defendants”).
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff in the action below is a law firm that…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Simion Stepanischen v. Merchants Despatch Transportation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Sil-Flo, Inc. v. SFHC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- United States ex rel. O'Connell v. Chapman UniversityDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.