Legal Opinion

Yoquelet v. Marshall County

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 2004No. 50A03-0309-CV-343PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

David Yoquelet and other former employees of Marshall County 1 (collectively "Employees") appeal the trial court's grant of Marshall County's motion for summary judgment. Employees raise one issue, which we restate as whether the trial court erred by granting Marshall County's motion for summary judgment in part. Because the appellants have not provided us with the materials necessary to consider their appeal, we affirm.

The relevant facts follow. On December 4, 1996, Employees filed a complaint for unpaid wages against Marshall County for the calendar years 1991…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Corr v. American Family InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hughes v. KingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. SLR Plumbing & Sewer, Inc. v. TurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kelly v. LevandoskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Bambi's Roofing, Inc. v. MoriartyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. City of Fort Wayne v. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Potter v. HoustonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Nobbe v. NobbeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API