Legal Opinion

City of Fort Wayne v. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 5, 2006No. 90A02-0512-CV-1155PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Judge.

The City of Fort Wayne (“City”) appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment filed by Pierce Manufacturing, Inc., (“Pierce”) and the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment filed by the City. The City raises two issues, one of which we find dispositive and restate as whether the trial court erred by denying the City’s motion to dismiss based upon Pierce’s lack of standing to contest the City’s award of a contract to another bidder. 1 We reverse. 2

The relevant facts follow. In 2004, the City wanted to purchase…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. John H. Shaffer, Administrator (Acting) of the Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brock v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Midwest Psychological Center, Inc. v. Indiana Department of AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Harmony Health Plan of Indiana, Inc. v. Indiana Department of AdministrationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Vectren Energy Marketing & Service, Inc. v. Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Hornberger v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Alva Electric, Inc. v. Evansville Vanderburgh School Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API