Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Allstate Insurance

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided January 13, 1999No. 98-2439 DVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART

DONALD, District Judge.

Before this court is the motion of Defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, to dismiss Plaintiffs’, Edmund Lindsey and Mattie Lindsey, complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs allege that Defendants violated their rights under the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601-3619, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982 by discriminating against them on the basis of race in premiums, claims handling procedures and policy renewal. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DavisTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  2. National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. Eva v. Midwest National Mortgage Banc, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2001
  4. Burrell v. State Farm & Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Microsoft Corp. v. Big Boy Distribution LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API