Legal Opinion
George v. Ohio Department of Human Services
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided September 20, 2001No. 01AP-347PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Tyack, Judge.
On November 27, 1995, Herman F. Seymour, individually and as executor of the estate of Hazel E. Seymour, filed a complaint in the Court of Claims of Ohio against the former Ohio Department of Human Services (“department”). 1 Prior to her death, Ms. Seymour had applied for Medicaid benefits. Ms. Seymour was an “institutionalized spouse” for purposes of Medicaid eligibility (she was in a nursing home). The department denied Ms. Seymour’s application on the basis of excess resources. An appeal of such denial was filed, but the denial was affirmed.
In the complaint, Mr. Seymour…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marks v. C.P. Chemical Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Hamilton v. Ohio Savings BankOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Ojalvo v. Board of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- 57 soc.sec.rep.ser. 220, Medicare & Medicaid Guide P 46,329 Robert Chambers v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Baughman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Petty v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- PHH Mtge. Corp. v. RamseyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Pivonka v. Sears, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
- Madyda v. Ohio Dept. of Pub. SafetyOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Yoder v. Hurst, 07ap-121 (9-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.