Legal Opinion

Yoder v. Hurst, 07ap-121 (9-20-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2007No. 07AP-121PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Defendants-appellants, Steve and Lisa Hurst, and Hurst Marketing Group, Inc. ("Hurst Marketing"), defaulted on a commercial lease with plaintiffs-appellees, Philip and Marjorie Yoder, and the Yoders filed suit to enforce their rights under the lease. The matter was heard by a magistrate in the trial court, who recommended judgment for the Yoders on all claims. The trial court adopted the magistrate's decision, entered judgment for the Yoders in the amount of $36,545.56, plus interest, and $18,812 for attorneys' fees.

The Hursts now appeal from that judgment, raising four…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bittner v. Tri-County Toyota, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Glidden Co. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Powell v. Grant Med. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Talty v. Freedman's Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gilson v. Am. Inst. of Alternative MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. OditaOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Mortgage Network, Inc. v. Ameribanc Mortgage Lending, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Bank of Am., N.A. v. RobledoOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Clarke v. RoyalOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API