Legal Opinion
LIMITED LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. v. Villegas
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided August 27, 2008No. 13-07-00370-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice VALDEZ.
This is an accelerated, interlocutory appeal from an order denying a special appearance. See Tex. Civ. PRác. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(7) (Vernon Supp.2007); Tex.R. Crv. P. 120a. Appellee, Carlos Romero Villegas, brought the underlying personal injury action against Rosemary Arredondo, individually and as an agent of Bath and Body Works, Bath and Body Works, Limited Brands, Inc., Special Distribution Services, and Limited Logistics Services, Inc. (hereinafter “Limited Logistics”). Appellant, Limited Logistics, is the only defendant that filed a special…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rockwall Commons Associates, Ltd. v. MRC Mortgage Grantor Trust I, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- West v. SMG, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Adam C. Leonard v. Salinas Concrete, LP, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Rogers v. RREF II CB Acquisitions, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Alencar v. Shaw, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.