Legal Opinion

United States v. David Williams, III

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2016No. 14-4680, 14-4689PublishedCited by 153 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Circuit Judge:

David James Williams, III and Kristin Deantanetta Williams (“Defendants”) were convicted and sentenced pursuant to stipulated plea agreements under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Both Defendants appeal from their convictions, but only Defendant Kristin Williams challenges her sentence. Regarding the convictions, we find no error below, and therefore affirm. But regarding the sentence imposed on Defendant Kristin Williams, we find that we lack jurisdiction to review her sentence because a sentence imposed pursuant to the terms of a Rule…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. United States v. Juan Martinez, A/K/A Jesus Garcia, A/K/A Roberto GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Paul CieslowskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Frank E. ReadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by153 opinions

  1. Arana v. Ochsner Health PlanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. Glenda Taylor-SandersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Quamaine SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. Alfredo Contador-CruzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  5. Church v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API