Legal Opinion
Legutko v. Local 816, International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 29, 1985No. CV84-1395PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEXLER, District Judge.
This is a labor case.
Plaintiffs have moved to amend their complaint, for class certification, and for partial summary judgment. Defendant Wallack has moved for summary judgment and to strike plaintiffs’ jury demand. Defendant Local has moved for summary judgment.
We see no reason to deny plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint. Accordingly, the proposed second amended complaint may be filed.
I. FACTS
Plaintiffs’ version of the facts is as follows:
In June 1982 defendant Wallack Freight Lines, plaintiffs’ employer, proposed a one-year rider to a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States & Canada v. Local 334, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of the United States & CanadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hernandez v. City Wide Insulation of Madison, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
- Legutko v. Local 816, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Gordon v. WinpisingerDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Guzman v. BevonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- King v. Fox Grocery Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.