Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Winpisinger
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 27, 1986No. 82 CV 0529PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
In a Memorandum and Order dated January 27, 1984, this Court held, inter alia, that plaintiffs’ first claim (“the LMRDA claim”) is governed by the three-year limitations period set forth in N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 214(2). See Gordon v. Winpisinger, 581 F.Supp. 234, 238 (E.D.N.Y.1984). Defendants move for reconsideration of that ruling, in light of a number of recent decisions holding, as defendants have urged, that the claim is governed by the six-month limitations period borrowed from § 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act. For the reasons set forth…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Local Union 1397, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio Ronald Weisen Thomas Jugan and Thomas Katona v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Lawrence F. Vallone v. Local Union No. 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Alonzo Linder v. Ole M. BergeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Clyde L. Davis, Jr., an Individual v. United Automobile, Aerospace and Agriculture Implement Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gvozdenovic v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Gvozdenovic v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991