Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Wartella v. Osick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1933No. Appeal 32PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Baldrige, J.,

Is compensation paid to. an employee under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736, and deposited in bank, exempt from attachment by a creditor? This question appears not to have been heretofore decided. The answer depends upon the interpretation of section 318 of the act (77 PS §621), which reads: “Claims for payments due under this article of this act shall not be assignable, and (except as provided in section five hundred and one of article five hereof) shall be exempt from all claims of creditors, and from levy, execution, or attachment, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. McIntosh v. AubreySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Commonwealth v. Sunbeam Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Gaddy v. First National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Rozelle v. RhodesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bell v. RobertsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. In Re Allen's GuardianshipSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Waldman v. Nolen (In Re Nolen)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 1986
  4. Wagner-Taylor Co. v. McDowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Billingslea v. TartellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API