Durham v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
1. It is now well settled that an act which does not purport to amend or repeal any particular law or section of the Code is not within par. 17 of sec. 7 of art. 3 of the constitution of this State, which declares that “No law, or section of the Code, shall be amended or repealed by mere reference to its title, or to the number of the section of the Code, but the amending or repealing act shall distinctly describe the law to be amended or repealed, as well as the alteration to be made.” Civil Code (1910), § 6445. Repeals by implication do not fall within the inhibition of this provision of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Choice v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
- Collins v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Holland v. ZollneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Johnson v. Southern Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Nolan v. Central Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Lawrence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Scoggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Fortson v. FortsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- State v. GlanzmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.